One of my favorite trips ever was a
2001 trip to Tunisia, almost ten years ago exactly. At the time, it struck me as almost the perfect
country: a perfect climate, beautiful seashores, a range of terrain including mountains and
deserts, great people, great food, and fun driving.
And there were amazing
Roman ruins scattered throughout the country.
Most of all, I was impressed by the people. I was a westerner travelling alone
in a predominantly Muslim country (this was pre-9/11), but I really never felt
uncomfortable, especially once I was out of the grittier parts of Tunis. The
countryside was beautiful, and the people were generous and friendly. It
reminded me more than any other trip how alike people really are, no matter the
country.
Now, of course, Tunisia is in the news due to the
recent riots and general unrest that caused the downfall of the regime and the
flight of their President.
Even in 2001, I noticed that
Ben Ali wasn't much liked:
|
There are pictures of Ben Ali (the current president) everywhere, I assume it's some kind of law. The expression on his face is difficult to pin down. I think he was aiming for a look that said "I have the vision to lead you" but to my eyes it looks like he's saying "I can get the chicks." The rulers of countries have a range of pick-up lines that aren't available to mere mortals. But in any case, most Tunisians don't have a god-like respect for their political leadership. Cynicism is probably a better word. |
And I also noticed the unemployment and dissatisfaction, which a fellow traveler
Smith and I commented on:
|
...Tunisia's unemployment rate is very high by any standard, and so there are a lot of young Tunisians loitering on the streets. |
|
"They have no jobs, so all they do is sit in the cafes and drink and smoke," Smith observed as we walked through the suburbs of Tunisia... |
|
"Sitting and smoking is better than rebelling," I replied. Smith laughed and nodded. |
Well, it looks like people stopped drinking and smoking. And now the Tunisian
disturbance has spread to
Egypt and
Yemen at least. How far will this go, and where will it end?
Hopefully this will end up with all of the repressive governments of the Middle
East being replaced by more representative governments that respect individual
rights and freedom of expression.
But I don't think it will.
Instead, I think only a few countries--the poorest ones--will see revolts.
Egypt, Yemen, and Tunisia are obvious candidates. Countries with a lot of
oil--and oil money--likely won't see these sorts of uprisings, since they have
more content citizens, and larger security forces. So the richer repressive
governments will be fine.
Even in the countries that do revolt, will democracy take root? Will we see a
flourishing of individual rights and freedoms in the Middle East?
Again, I hope so, but I wouldn't bet on it.
The main reason I don't think so is that these riots are creating power vacuums.
There is no credible democratic opposition in Tunisia, Yemen, or Egypt.
Instead, various fringe power groups will try to take control. Even worse,
Western countries have a poor image in these countries, and many of the hated
regimes had at various points attempted to Westernize. So a shift to supposedly
"western" values such as individual rights or democracy could easily be twisted
by demagogues to appear as non-patriotic!
This problem of a power vacuum was first really studied during the
French Revolution.
In fact, the French Revolution was studied and used as a template for action by
the Bolsheviks when they seized power after the
Russian Revolution of 1917.
The result of the French Revolution? The
Reign of Terror, culminating in Bonaparte's dictatorship. It took many years--a generation--before the
Republic gained its footing.
The result of the Russian Revolution? The
Red Terror and Communism, which didn't really fall until 1990.
In fact, there are very few examples of revolutions leading to democracies that
champion individual rights, and they all seemed to involve politically powerful or influential pro-democatric
factions involved from the start. So I am not optimistic about prospects for
democracy and individual freedoms in the Middle East in the near term.
There is one chief learning through all of this that I hope pro-democracy
countries take note of. That is the role of the Internet in the upheavals. It
was the ability of people to communicate events and plan across entire countries
at once that made the uprisings so effective and total.
I've had this crazy idea for a while, so I'll mention it now: pro-democracy
countries should fund smartphone networks that cover repressive autocracies. We
(the world's pro-freedom countries) should build out the networks, and provide
hardware, for citizens of countries who are denied freedom of speech. We could
even give away the smartphones to citizens for free, through airdrops or other
delivery methods.
We'd want to ensure that the majority of the smart phones reached real citizens,
and not the regime. And our control of the network would mean that citizens
could communicate with each other and the rest of the world without the regime
intercepting, blocking, or listening to the messages.
This would cost billions, but would be far cheaper than troops on the ground, and maybe more
effective.
It is also a beautiful asymmetric attack. If a repressive regime retaliated by
building a free smart phone network for us, I think we would welcome it.
Tell your congressman about this idea. We should give away smart phones and
operate networks that cover the world's repressive regimes!
But in the meantime, pray for the people of the countries that are rioting, and
hope they get better governments than what they have now. I think the best
action we as outsiders can take is to ensure that all of those involved are able to
communicate with each other and the outside world.
Comments
|
Related:
economics
geopolitics
predictions
Unrelated:
books
energy
environment
lists
mathematics
science
|