Internet (and communications) to the people!Image courtesy of Philip Halling In my previous post (
Upheavals in the Middle East) I mentioned my crazy idea for giving free Internet connections (and smart
phones) to people in repressive regimes. The idea is that by having the the
ability to communicate with each other and the outside world, people in those
countries would be able to avoid one of the chief tools of repression: limited
access to information.
Also, within repressive regimes, access to communications and outside
information can itself be an agent for change and improvement--and even
revolution. Witness how Tunisia and Egypt both attempted to crack down on the
Internet during the recent protests, with
Egypt going to particular extremes.
In fact, Egypt cut off Internet access just as I was posting my blog entry about
using the Internet as an asymmetric attack against repressive regimes! Talk
about coincidences.
Yesterday
Slashdot had a link to a story about how the
US has secret tools to force Internet on dictatorships (which references a
Wired story as the primary source), which I thought was awesome timing given my blog post! Obviously
both Wired and Slashdot read my blog a lot.
However, the story isn't quite what I was thinking. The Wired story talks about
how the US Gov't could take out foreign computer networks (hardly news) or even
restore some Internet service to localized areas via flying networks or satellite dish drops.
All in all, I found it pretty underwhelming, and small-scale. Plus, as the
article noted, flying our own aircraft in someone else's airspace could be
construed as an act of war, even if we were just flying Internet relay stations.
No, it's way better to go the full deal. Set up satellite-based internet, using
satellite-enabled smart phones or routers. Then people could get access to the
Internet, and communicate with each other, without us having to invade peoples'
air space. In fact, we could just provide satellite-based Internet hubs, and
people could use their own smart phones. That would be more flexible and
cheaper.
[Providing a satellite network does raise the problem of antisatellite weapons, but having satellites isn't
by itself an act of war.]
Would providing a satellite-based Internet for North Korea, China, or Myanmar be
expensive? Sure, maybe billions of dollars a year. But a war costs
billions of dollars a week. So providing free satellite-based Internet to repressive regimes could be
even more effective, at a fraction of the price, not even counting the lives
saved.
Comments
|
Related:
economics
geopolitics
Unrelated:
books
energy
environment
lists
mathematics
predictions
science
|