I was just reading through the 26 June edition of
Nature. There are usually a few interesting tidbits in every issue. This issue
focused on "Cosmic Cataclysms": particularly impacts.
There was a good story on the
Tunguska blast of 1908. I had recently read that Lake Cheko could be the remnants of the impact
crater. Soundings had indicated a curious impact-shaped dimple at the bottom
of the lake, and a follow-on visit was planned to look for meteorite debris at
the bottom. However, the Nature article didn't think highly of the Lake Cheko
theory.
Another article, "The Burger Bar that Saved the World," was excellent. It
talked to a group of long-time asteroid hunters that had started searching for
near-Earth asteroids in the 70's, and they had a 30+ year perspective on how
asteroid hunting had changed. Certainly the technology has changed a lot!
And the idea that impacts were common on Earth was new. Many of the
scientists claim that it was
Alvarez's theory about the impact that killed the dinosaurs that really woke people up: here was proof that a rather small impact had
decimated life on Earth.
The article was a good read. It interspersed comments from several scientists
to give an overview of how the field had evovled.
But I was shocked by comments by Clark Chapman about a near-miss in 2004. He
writes:
In 2004, an object was discovered ... and the nominal calculated orbit had
the asteroid hitting the Earth the next day. ... [JPL] concluded that there
was something on the order of a 30% chance that this object would hit the
Earth during the next three days.
He noted that the European and North American observatories were desperately
trying to observe the object to get better data, but weather was bad over both
continents, and no one could see it.
So we were debating late into the night, at what point should we go public
with this?
Wow.
As it turns out, later observations revealed that the object was larger than
originally thought, but also farther away. And so the collision chances
dropped to around zero.
But regardless, there was a period of a day or so when the world's leading
experts thought there was a 30% probability that an asteroid would hit the
Earth.
Rusty Schweickart has since started the B612 Foundation (named after the asteroid in Saint
Exupery's
The Little Prince) which is attempting to establish protocols for engaging the United Nations
and other bodies when an impact is deemed imminent.
So sleep soundly, but not too soundly.
Comments
|
Related:
science
Unrelated:
books
economics
energy
environment
geopolitics
lists
mathematics
predictions
|