With the
tsunami in Japan, and
continued unrest in the Mideast, it was easy to miss today's headlines that
Portugal's prime minister resigned and
the country needed an EU bailout to avoid default.
Furthermore, not only is Portugal very likely to need a bailout, it increased
speculation that
Spain may be next.
Why did Portugal's prime minister resign? Because all the opposition
parties and
most of Portugal's organized labor opposed his austerity measures to get the budget under control. Rather than
accept the required spending cuts and tax raises to fix the country's fiscal
problems, there were
strong protests to raise government wages instead. Obviously, that would just make the problem worse, however much the
wage increases may be desired or even deserved.
This followed a familiar pattern:
Now we see the same pattern in Portugal, and I and
others believe Spain will be next. I'll make a prediction that Spain will ask for an EU bailout before the
end of 2011.
One option may be to let Portugal default! Countries have defaulted before (
Sovereign Bankruptcies). Portugal isn't a complete basket case, and defaulting would still put them
in a position where they'd have to enact severe austerity measures,
but they could rebuild on their own. A default may not be much worse than an EU
bailout anyway, and may be healthy to remind investors that giving your money to
governments is not a safe bet. This would raise the borrowing costs for all
countries, which would also be a good thing. And it would be a strong
message to Spain that it needs to get its own house in order, and not also rely
on an EU bailout.
But I don't think that will happen. Portugal and Spain will ask for, and
receive, EU bailouts instead.
Before we in the US start pointing fingers, remember that
our own budget is pretty hosed as well. In fact, just yesterday it was noted that
our federal disability funds are about to run out because they are being abused by many states. And even without people abusing
disability benefits, scheduled spending means
Medicare and Social Security will start to hit insolvency in 2017. In fact, Medicare is already running a deficit and is burning through the
taxes of previous years.
And like everyone facing crises in European countries, even though the
mathematics make it obvious that we have to reduce Medicare and Social Security
spending, many people don't want their benefits to go down. (However, the latest
bipartisan efforts to address the problem are a very encouraging step.)
The main learnings? First, deficit spending does eventually catch up to
you.
And second, if a country lets things get out of control, most people won't want
to fix it, because it will mean they'll have less money during the austerity
period. That means fixes get postponed until they are too late, and the
recovery (if it happens) is much more severe.
The main thing is to vote for representatives that will get the budget under
control. Representatives are terrified of touching Medicare or Social
Security because they think we'll vote them out. We have to let our reps know
that we'll support responsible budget planning, even if it means reduced
benefits, to avoid bankruptcy.
Comments
|
Related:
economics
geopolitics
predictions
Unrelated:
books
energy
environment
lists
mathematics
science
|