Wavepacket Blog
only displaying 'lists' posts
>
2010
    August
         Mon Aug 30 21:29:19 2010
Prediction Checkpoint 2
         Mon Aug 16 22:19:31 2010
Prediction Checkpoint 1
         Thu Aug 5 21:05:04 2010
More Platitudes
    >> Older entries >>
    >> links >>
Mon Aug 30 21:29:19 2010
 
Prediction Checkpoint 2
 How did I do on real estate?


Love shack!
Image courtesy of Oven Fresh (wiki)
 
In an earlier entry ( Prediction Checkpoint 1) I reviewed many of my blog predictions to date. My score? Roughly 7 out of 12--just better than 50%.  
 
But that wasn't all of my predictions. In a blog post from last year ( The Dream Tour) I toured several properties and guessed what they would sell for. How did I do with my real estate predictions?  
 


Offered at $499K, I said it was a steal.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
First up was this view home on Queen Anne. It was listed for $499K at the time, was delisted and relisted, and finally sold for $458K. I didn't really make a prediction, but said it was "a steal" at $499K.  
 
So I think I got this one wrong. It went for less than I expected.


Offered at $800K, I said lower 700's.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
This was a nice place with a great view in Magnolia, which was listed at $800K. I said:  
 
     If it gets to the low 700s I think it will move--and I think the sellers are probably aware of that and would consider an offer in that range now!
 
Final sale price: $720K. I think I got that one right!


Offered at $495K, I didn't guess a sales price.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
This was a fixer-upper with a view in West Seattle, listed at $495K. I said  
 
     this could be worth a lot more with some straightforward investment.
 
but I didn't actually quote a sales price. It sold for $450K. So I'll count this one as a miss.


Offered at $650K, I didn't guess a sales price.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
Then there was a property with south Lake Washington waterfront, listed at $650K. It sold for $550K. Again, I didn't guess a sales price! So I have to count this one as a miss.


Offered at $795K, I said something between 650 and 750.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
There was another waterfront property, this one a house on the Ballard locks, offered at $795K. I said:  
 
     I think it will start being attractive in the 650-700 range.
 
Sales price? $715K. So I think I got this one right.


Offered at $649K, I guessed in the mid- to upper 500's.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
There was a nice house with a large lot on Beacon Hill, which was listed at $649K. I said:  
 
     I think a price in the mid- to upper-500s would be a bargain.
 
The actual sales price? $575K. So I'll say I got this one right too.


Offered at $479K, I guessed under $450K.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
This was a cute home in Seward Park, listed at $479K. I said:  
 
     ...something under $450K strikes me as a good price...
 
The sales price? $450K. I'll count that as a correct guess (I was within one dollar!).


Offered at $350K, I didn't guess a sales price.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
This was a beat-up house in South Seattle, listed at $350K. I didn't guess a price.  
 
It sold for $315K, so I'll count that one as a miss.


Still for sale! Was $750K, now $679K.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
This one is waterfront property on the Puget Sound, which was listed at $750K. It is still listed today at $679K. I said:  
 
     ...you may have some room to bargain the price down a bit more.
 
So I'll just not count that one. It hasn't sold, so I can't claim I was right, but the price is definitely dropping, as I predicted.


Offered at $699K, I said under $600K.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
This was waterfront on Vashon Island, listed at $699K. I said:  
 
     It's possible that under $600K would get you a great waterfront location on Vashon...
 
Final sales price? $575K. So I'll say I got that one right!


Still for sale! Was $425K, now $417K.
Image courtesy of Redfin
 
And finally, this last property was my favorite! A beautiful waterfront home on just minutes from the Vashon ferry, listed at $425K. It went off the market for a long time. It just re-listed two weeks ago, now at $417K. Last year I said:  
 
     ...this is probably a good deal in the $400K range, if there aren't serious problems.
 
Again, I won't count this one at all, since it hasn't sold. But the price is coming down!  
 
By the way, this could be an amazing property! According to the listing, "The Seller is motivated and will finance...". If the foundations are okay this is really worth a look! So that was it. Out of 11 properties, I got 5 right, 4 wrong, and 2 still haven't sold, so I won't count them. That means my final tally is 5 out of 9 correct for real estate, or 12 out of 21 overall.  
 
So I won't quit my day job just yet, but I'm still batting over 50% on my predictions!  

Comments

Related:
  predictions
  > lists <


Unrelated:
  books
  economics
  energy
  environment
  geopolitics
  mathematics
  science

 

Mon Aug 16 22:19:31 2010
 
Prediction Checkpoint 1
 How am I doing after over 2 years of predictions?


In the future, we all wear velvet.
Image courtesy of Andreagrossman (wiki)
 
I've been making a lot of predictions over the past two years! I thought I would look back and see how I did. I force myself to make predictions because, even if wrong, I'll usually figure out why I was wrong. In fact, the predictions I got wrong are probably the most interesting.  
 
There were a lot of predictions, so this is part 1.  
 
In The Great Stagflation of 2008 (March 2008), I predicted a few years of stagflation (weak or no economic growth even with low interest rates), and I was right. I was also right about gas prices: I made the bold prediction that we'd see gas for over $4.50 a gallon by 2010, when in fact we saw those prices later in 2008!  
 
However, then in Gas Prices (June 2008), I predicted gas prices of $6 per gallon in 2008 (!). Obviously I got that one wrong. Why did I get it wrong? Because the economic downturn started kicking in, and gas consumption dropped. And according to the supply and demand curve, when demand drops given constant supply, prices will drop. What did I learn from this wrong prediction? Spikes in gas prices will usually be followed by economic contraction, which in turn result in lower demand. Don't get me wrong, I still think gas prices will rise. But it will probably be a series of spikes and recessions, rather than an unbroken upward climb.  
 
In The S-Word (July 2008), I predicted that the Federal Reserve would flounder along with low interest rates rather than slowly raising rates to protect the dollar. This was a mixed result. I was right about the Federal Reserve: it has kept rates low. But I was wrong about the dollar: we haven't see huge inflation or a weakening of the dollar against other currencies. Why was I wrong about the dollar weakening? Lending has slowed so much that even with low interest rates, we haven't seen the extravagant spending that can cause inflation. And other countries are also having economic problems, so the dollar has remained stable (although see below for more predictions about the dollar vs. other currencies).  
 
In one of my worst predictions ever, I said that Congress wouldn't support a big bailout of investment banks ( Just say No). But that was just the first vote. On the next day, Congress approved TARP. Ooops. And I also said: the FDIC will continue to take possession of troubled banks (right), the Federal Reserve will keep open its line of cheap credit for financial institutions (right), a few more financial institutions will collapse (right), and the economy would stay flat until March 2009 (spectacularly wrong!). Why was I wrong about TARP? I don't know. Congress chose to give lots of money to failed investment bankers, when that money could have been used in other ways. I still don't get that. Why was I wrong about the depth of the recession? I underestimated the impact of the housing and investment banking collapse on spending. Next time, I'll do more research on spending data before making predictions like that!  
 
In The Healthcare Debate (September 2009), I predicted that Congress would eventually pass a watered-down version of healthcare reform that increased coverage, at higher expense, but wouldn't actually fix the underlying economic problems. I was right!  
 
In The 2009-2010 Winter Forecast (October 2009), I predicted less than 450 inches of snow at Mt Baker for the 2009-2010 ski season. The result? WRONG. Baker got 634 inches. And that was a bad year. What did I learn about a bad snow prediction for Mt. Baker? Mt. Baker rocks.  
 
So those were the predictions I've made so far that I could measure. The tally so far? 7 right and 5 wrong. I'm happy with a better-than-50-percent hit rate!  
 
There were a few predictions that we won't know for a while. In Peak Oil, I predicted gas at $10 a gallon by 2018, and nationwide gasoline rationing by 2023. You heard it here first.  
 
Also, in TV Shows are Dead, I made several predictions about what will happen to television. But again, those are farther out (maybe by 2014 or 2015).  

Comments

Related:
  predictions
  > lists <


Unrelated:
  books
  economics
  energy
  environment
  geopolitics
  mathematics
  science

 

Thu Aug 5 21:05:04 2010
 
More Platitudes
 A few more great rules of thumb for personal finance...


Something changed, Ben: have you been working out?
Image courtesy of TerraFrost (wiki)
 
Way back in December I gave my list of Personal Finance Platitudes. Today, Yahoo! Finance had their own list of rules, which I thought was pretty good.  
 
I had often noticed what I called the "Rule of Threes", whereby I would prefer to buy cars that cost at most 1/3 of my yearly income, and houses at most 3 times my income. It is a handy rule to keep in mind when shopping for cars or houses! But I wasn't sure why those particular numbers worked.  
 
The Yahoo! article gives the math behind the numbers.  
 
That article also mentions the high cost of kids (at least $220K per child up to age 18, not counting private education or college!). And it has a good rule of thumb for education loans: don't take on more college debt than you expect to earn per year when you get out. Again, a simple rule, and they break down why.  
 
And finally, they had a rule for retirement: target a total retirement savings of 25 times what you make now (!).  
 
Here is their list in short:
  1. Don't spend more than 1/3 your yearly income on a car.
  2. Don't spend more than 3 times your yearly income on a house.
  3. Kids are expensive.
  4. Limit your total college loan amount to what you expect as an initial yearly salary.
  5. Target 25x your current income for retirement.

Comments

Related:
  economics
  > lists <


Unrelated:
  books
  energy
  environment
  geopolitics
  mathematics
  predictions
  science

 

Links: Science Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory    Blog Directory    Blog Blog    Technorati Profile    Strange Attractor