I just received the
2007 Annual Report from the
Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, also known as Y2Y.
If you aren't familiar with Y2Y, check out their site. Skip their
vision statement since it is somewhat fuzzy and vague, although it does at least mention
"habitat connectivity."
Instead, take a look at their
scientific rationale and read the
story of Pluie, a grey wolf that was tagged so they could track her movements throughout the
greater Y2Y area. Or see my
old Y2Y blog entry.
The basic idea is connectivity: the idea that existing parks and habitats
should be well-connected so that
megafauna can roam freely across their historic ranges. Although there are several
large parks in Canada and the United States in this area, many animals (bears,
wolves, fish, birds) need even larger habitats. Rather than block off a huge
area into a
megapark, which is unrealistic, the idea is to focus on good-sized parks with
corridors that connect them for wildlife to move through.
[Aside: check out the
distincion between
r- and K-selectivity. I hadn't seen that before!]
So what happened in 2007?
For one thing, they have widened their strategy somewhat. To help prioritize
efforts, they have split their investigations into three areas focused on key
animals:
- Bears. This effort focuses on the needs of large animals such as
bear, wolves, and elk.
Grizzly bears are used as the benchmark species since it is believed if the Grizzly can expand to something like
its original habitat, then other large animals can as well. This was the original vision of Y2Y, and the most mature.
- Birds. This effort focuses on
20 focal species.
- Fish. This effort is still getting started, but focuses on
focal species and key watersheds in an effort to keep native species healthy.
Based on those three strategies, they identify the
highest-priority areas to focus on. (Check out the map in that link!)
I'm a bit worried that the strategy has broadened so much. There is a danger
that trying to do everything results in doing nothing. But it looks like
their change to three conservation strategies just boils down to using a more sophisticated method of picking
high-priority areas, which is fine.
They also list how they spent close to $500K in grants in 2007. Most of the
money, $250K, went towards the purchase of an 87 acre parcel of private land
in southeast BC, on behalf of the
Nature Trust of British Columbia. Surprising that they had to spend so much for that! But this is exactly
the sort of purchase that Y2Y is focused on. Hopefully we'll see more of
these in the coming years.
I think Y2Y represents one of the better approaches to saving large ecosystems
in the Northwest! Definitely check it out and consider making a
donation. I donate every year.
Comments
|
Related:
environment
Unrelated:
books
economics
energy
geopolitics
lists
mathematics
predictions
science
|