|
Thu Jun 16 23:51:11 2011 Vancouver Riots Crowdsourcing vs. crowds |
For those of you that follow hockey, the
Stanley Cup finals completed last night, and Boston beat Vancouver for the title.
Although people do tend to be
somewhat irrational about sports, some Vancouver Canucks fans (or supposed fans) took things a bit overboard
and
rioted in anger over the loss. Actually, it's not clear that they were angry about losing, but
they certainly wanted to riot. Almost 150 people needed to visit the hospital,
and 100 people were arrested.
Also, there was looting and damage to businesses, cars overturned and set on
fire, and the usual riot mess. The damage was spread around a hundred blocks
downtown.
The worst part of rioting? Rioters often get away with it. They fade into the
crowd, and aren't easy to identify. They smash some windows, grab some loot,
and disappear.
However, that may change this time. A few websites are supporting
crowdsourcing as a way to identify as many people as possible in the riots. The idea is that
anyone can post pictures and video of the riots, and people can surf what's
there to see if they recognize anyone. If they recognize anyone, they are
encouraged to contact the Vancouver police.
Pretty cool! I sure hope they catch a number of rioters this way. There is
some coverage of the sites
here, and you can see some example crowdsourcing sites
here and
here. See anyone you know?
I haven't yet heard of people running footage or images through
Facebook's facial recognition software, but it seems like an obvious next step! That would be a fast and accurate way
to identify people in the crowd.
There is definitely a risk of vigilante action or false accusations for this,
but it is no worse than not using crowdsourcing, and may be a way to help
identify looters and criminals easier. Also, it requires that people volunteer
their photos, so hopefully Vancouver rioters will be identified and brought
before authorities, but participants in the
Arab Spring will remain safely unknown to authoritarian governments.
Comments
|
Related:
> geopolitics <
Unrelated:
books
economics
energy
environment
lists
mathematics
predictions
science
|
|
Thu Mar 24 22:46:19 2011 Bankrupt Portugal Another EU domino falls? |
With the
tsunami in Japan, and
continued unrest in the Mideast, it was easy to miss today's headlines that
Portugal's prime minister resigned and
the country needed an EU bailout to avoid default.
Furthermore, not only is Portugal very likely to need a bailout, it increased
speculation that
Spain may be next.
Why did Portugal's prime minister resign? Because all the opposition
parties and
most of Portugal's organized labor opposed his austerity measures to get the budget under control. Rather than
accept the required spending cuts and tax raises to fix the country's fiscal
problems, there were
strong protests to raise government wages instead. Obviously, that would just make the problem worse, however much the
wage increases may be desired or even deserved.
This followed a familiar pattern:
Now we see the same pattern in Portugal, and I and
others believe Spain will be next. I'll make a prediction that Spain will ask for an EU bailout before the
end of 2011.
One option may be to let Portugal default! Countries have defaulted before (
Sovereign Bankruptcies). Portugal isn't a complete basket case, and defaulting would still put them
in a position where they'd have to enact severe austerity measures,
but they could rebuild on their own. A default may not be much worse than an EU
bailout anyway, and may be healthy to remind investors that giving your money to
governments is not a safe bet. This would raise the borrowing costs for all
countries, which would also be a good thing. And it would be a strong
message to Spain that it needs to get its own house in order, and not also rely
on an EU bailout.
But I don't think that will happen. Portugal and Spain will ask for, and
receive, EU bailouts instead.
Before we in the US start pointing fingers, remember that
our own budget is pretty hosed as well. In fact, just yesterday it was noted that
our federal disability funds are about to run out because they are being abused by many states. And even without people abusing
disability benefits, scheduled spending means
Medicare and Social Security will start to hit insolvency in 2017. In fact, Medicare is already running a deficit and is burning through the
taxes of previous years.
And like everyone facing crises in European countries, even though the
mathematics make it obvious that we have to reduce Medicare and Social Security
spending, many people don't want their benefits to go down. (However, the latest
bipartisan efforts to address the problem are a very encouraging step.)
The main learnings? First, deficit spending does eventually catch up to
you.
And second, if a country lets things get out of control, most people won't want
to fix it, because it will mean they'll have less money during the austerity
period. That means fixes get postponed until they are too late, and the
recovery (if it happens) is much more severe.
The main thing is to vote for representatives that will get the budget under
control. Representatives are terrified of touching Medicare or Social
Security because they think we'll vote them out. We have to let our reps know
that we'll support responsible budget planning, even if it means reduced
benefits, to avoid bankruptcy.
Comments
|
Related:
economics
> geopolitics <
predictions
Unrelated:
books
energy
environment
lists
mathematics
science
|
|
Thu Feb 10 16:39:00 2011 Peak Oil Revisited Are oil reserves overstated? |
Today I saw another mention of a leaked cable from the
Wikileaks trove. People are apparently publishing new leaked cables all the time as they find
interesting tidbits.
This particular series of leaked cables showed that throughout 2007-2009, US diplomats
believed that
Saudi Arabia had overstated its crude reserves by up to 40 percent. In particular, a high-ranking executive at
Saudi Aramco, the Saudi Arabian national oil company, stated that he believed their reserves
were inflated, and he convinced US diplomats and other international energy
experts.
In general, there have long been suspicions that
OPEC countries have inflated their reserves. It has been hard to tell how worried to be: how much of the bump was due to
improved measurements or accounting changes, versus more arbitrary changes? The
leaked cables are significant because they indicate that even insiders believe
the reserves are arbitrary inflated to a large extent.
Does this mean we'll suddenly run out of oil? No, there are still around
a trillion barrels of proven reserves.
But the Saudi/Aramco reserves are most critical because now that
Russian production is declining, Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world who is capable of keeping up
with the world's growing oil consumption. And the problem with limited reserves
isn't that we run out of oil, instead the problem with limited reserves is
that the cheap oil runs out quickly, leaving only more expensive oil to be
extracted. And so, over time, oil production peaks.
The leaked cables indicate that Saudi oil production could peak in the next ten
years, which they say is "not good news." Worse, it means global oil production
could peak earlier--if it hasn't already.
The bottom line? As I've said before (
Peak Oil), expect gas prices to start going up significantly again, and they probably
won't come down. Or if they do come down, it will because of further economic
recessions, not improved production.
So start planning now! Expect gas to hit $5 or even $10 a gallon in the next
ten years. If you do a lot of driving, see if you can move nearer to public
transit, because you won't want to be driving much.
Comments
|
Related:
economics
> geopolitics <
environment
Unrelated:
books
energy
lists
mathematics
predictions
science
|
|
|